Back

CO<sub>2</sub> capture and conversion perspectives for a cleaner future

Reactive carbon process (Download Image)

Reactive capture integrates CO2 capture and CO2 conversion, generating valuable products and feedstocks directly from mixed gas streams. Process steps for separate carbon capture and conversion are shown in green and orange, respectively, and reactive capture in a single step in purple. Within this single step, researchers highlight key considerations for research and development of reactive capture processes.

To date, most CO2 capture and conversion processes have been developed in isolation, where the output of the capture process is purified, compressed CO2, which can be used as the feedstock for the CO2 conversion process. This is an energy intensive process and purified CO2 stream still needs to be delivered to the location where it will be converted to the desired product, thus further increasing energy demand. Co-locating CO2 capture and conversion into one reactive capture system would eliminate the need for transport and compression. Reactive CO2 capture is an emerging process intensification approach for generating CO2-derived products that hold the potential for energy savings.

In a recent perspective article, published in Joule, LLNL researchers and collaborators define “reactive capture” as the coupled and integrated process of capturing CO2 from a mixed gas stream and converting it into valuable products without a separate process step to generate purified CO2. The article introduces unique challenges to this emerging technology, while also describing the current strategies, the state of technology for reactive capture, and providing a roadmap to guide research toward realizing these potential benefits.

The researchers propose that the value proposition for reactive capture is the reduction of energy intensity and capital expense in the production of CO2-derived chemicals and materials. They explain that while the field of reactive capturing is still just emerging, it is important to assess these technologies from a process- and system-level perspective so that showstoppers and scale-up challenges can be identified early in development, before the costs of pivoting become insurmountable. Additionally, the technology must progress in parallel with an eye toward ultimate use. For example, a viable system must operate for thousands of hours, preferably in a continuous mode that necessarily matches capture and conversion rates.

Finally, the team’s roadmap includes the early identification of critical risks to technology scale-up and deployment. Foreseeable risks can be mitigated if identified early enough in the development process—these include the suitability of the process for scale-up and the ability to scale the manufacturing of the required components while retaining the required performance. In certain cases, the processes can be re-designed, and materials can be changed, but these changes take time and must be undertaken early. Risk mitigation and demonstration under real-world conditions give the best chance for reactive capture to bring about carbon utilization at impactful scales.

This work was funded, in part, by the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Directed Research Development (LDRD) program (19-SI-005).

[M,C. Freyman, Z. Huang, D., Eric B. Duoss, Y. Li, S.E. Baker, S.H. Pang, J.A. Schaidle, Reactive CO2 capture: A path forward for process integration in carbon management Author links open overlay panel, Joule (2023), DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2023.03.013.]

Physical and Life Sciences Communications Team