STR Masthead

S&TR Home

Subscribe

Take Our Survey

S&TR Index

S&TR Staff

Article title: Quark Theory and Today's Supercomputers: It's a Match; article blurb: How do quarks behave? Quantum chromodynamics offers the theory but requires enormous computing power to do the math. Graphic of a quark simulation.
A simulation captures the potential energy between two quarks, which make up protons and neutrons.

LIVERMORE’S BlueGene/L, the world’s most powerful computer, was designed for big jobs. Balancing a checkbook does not require a massively parallel supercomputer, but trying to discern what happened right after the big bang most certainly does.

Quarks, the building blocks of all nuclear material, ran free for about 10-millionths of a second after the big bang. Then, as the universe began to expand and cool, quarks coalesced into protons and neutrons, held together by massless gluons. Since the big bang about 13.7 billion years ago, quarks have never been on their own, except for a few brief moments in a particle accelerator at Brookhaven National Laboratory and during the occasional cataclysmic cosmic-ray collision.

The experiments at Brookhaven, where gold ions were blasted apart into individual quarks, are the driver behind the computational effort to re-create the phase transition from quarks to larger particles. Some of the particles are common ones, such as neutrons and protons, and others are more exotic. Physicist Ron Soltz, who led Livermore’s participation in the experiments at Brookhaven, says, “We succeeded in freeing the constituent quarks very briefly. However, what we observed after the experiment was not what we expected to see.” Researchers thought they would find a hot, energized gas—or plasma—in which particles did not interact. Instead, they found strong particle interactions. “Our current models are only partially successful in explaining what we observed,” says Soltz.

Livermore researchers working with theoretical physicists from around the world are using BlueGene/L to fill in the missing information about the phase transition. They are applying mathematics and the basic laws of physics to explain and extend results from the accelerator experiments at Brookhaven. Their calculations of the conditions surrounding the transition from quarks to larger particles are based on the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). (See the box below.)

QCD was developed in the 1970s to explain how a vast array of particles could arise from only a few types of quarks, which are forever trapped inside. QCD describes the “strong force,” whimsically termed color (chroma in Greek), that prevents quarks from running free except under extreme conditions. QCD has been called “the most perfect physical theory” by one its coinventors because of its broad scope and simplicity.

“The Most Perfect Physical Theory”

Before the protons and neutrons that make up atoms, there were quarks. Quarks still exist, but now they are bound up in these and other larger particles. Six “flavors” of quarks—up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom—make up almost everything in the visible universe. A proton, for example, is composed of two up quarks and one down quark. A neutron is made of two down quarks and one up quark. Up and down quarks are the least massive and most prevalent. More massive and more rare particles, such as kaons, hyperons, and charmed baryons, are composed of other quark combinations.

The various flavors of quarks also possess a type of charge, or quantum number, known as “color.” Color is the source of the “strong force” that gluons carry, causing quarks to be confined in protons, neutrons, and other particles. While electromagnetism has two charges (positive and negative), the strong force has three charges (red, green, and blue). The strong force is responsible for the interactions of nuclear particles and is the basic ingredient of nuclear physics.

In the early 1970s, a team of scientists calculated how quarks are confined in larger particles. They showed that inside protons and neutrons, quarks behave almost as free particles, just as they did immediately after the big bang. This phenomenon of extremely weak interactions is known as asymptotic freedom. However, as the universe began to cool and expand, quarks moved apart, and the energy in their immediate vicinity declined. Nevertheless, the force between them did not diminish. Instead, as the distances between quarks increased, the force between them increased, pulling them together and confining them in larger particles. Pulling quarks apart requires a very large amount of energy that is eventually converted to mass through the creation of new quarks. These quarks quickly combine with the original quarks and form new nuclear particles. Hence, quarks are never seen in isolation.

The new theory of the strong force is called quantum chromodynamics (QCD): “quantum” because it describes subatomic particles that are governed by the laws of quantum mechanics, and “chromodynamics” because it describes the behavior of color, the source of the strong force. QCD explains why quarks only behave as completely free particles at extremely high temperatures and energies. In 2004, the three codiscoverers of asymptotic freedom and QCD as an explanation for the strong force received the Nobel Prize in Physics.

Frank Wilczek, a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who shared the 2004 prize, has called QCD “the most perfect physical theory.” Says Livermore physicist Pavlos Vranas, “Part of the theory’s appeal is its broad scope. It applies to the smallest of particles as well as to cosmology, the science of the entire universe.” QCD also requires very few parameters. Once the likelihood of finding quarks is determined for a particular energy scale, explaining a single nuclear particle of massless quarks requires just two pieces of information: the flavors and the colors. Most theories are much more complicated and require more information.

“However,” says Vranas, “if we are modeling many quarks and how they interact for comparison with experimental results, we must include all of the exact physical information.” Size, mass, temperature, and energy then become essential data.

The Match
In the past, theoretical physicists have worked with pencil, paper, and their ingenuity to formulate new theories, such as relativity, string theory, and supersymmetry. However, in many cases, finding solutions to a theory’s equations, such as calculating the strong force, is virtually impossible by hand. The complexities of QCD calculations, in fact, have been a motivating factor behind the design of supercomputers.

In the late 1970s, famed physicist Richard Feynman designed a network for an early supercomputer and used it for QCD calculations. QCD theoretical physicists at Columbia University in New York City have long had a close working relationship with supercomputer designers at IBM’s nearby T. J. Watson Research Laboratory. QCD theorist Pavlos Vranas came to Livermore from IBM, where he was a member of the core architecture team for the Blue Gene line of supercomputers and lead designer of the Blue Gene network.

It is no coincidence, then, that a massively parallel computer is the ideal tool for simulating the interaction of quarks and other nuclear particles. BlueGene/L’s processors communicate among themselves in much the same way that quarks and gluons interact in lattice QCD, the most accurate methodology for simulating the strong force. Lattice QCD defines space–time as a four-dimensional grid of points connected with links.

The 2006 Gordon Bell Prize for Special Achievement was awarded to the BlueGene/L supercomputer and quantum chromodynamics project team led by Vranas and Soltz. The team demonstrated the supercomputer’s performance in a simulation that proved to be an ideal match between the demands of lattice QCD calculations with the computing capabilities of BlueGene/L. A version of lattice QCD written especially for BlueGene/L showed that the simulation scales almost perfectly. Lattice QCD can run on the full machine using all 131,072 processors, just as efficiently as it does using 1,024.

In a lattice QCD simulation, the lattice is broken into smaller pieces, or sublattices. “Each processor works on a sublattice, and the processors are connected by a network,” says Vranas. “For optimal operation, we needed to code the machine carefully.” In October 2006, their coding produced a sustained operating speed of 70.4 trillion floating-point operations per second (teraflops), an extraordinarily fast performance.

Because BlueGene/L has many users, QCD researchers can routinely use only a percentage of its capacity. The typical simulation volume on BlueGene/L is equivalent to just a few proton diameters, or a few quadrillionths of a meter. However, simulations using 10 percent of the machine’s processors could reproduce essentially the full range of thermodynamic QCD behavior. “The QCD community is thrilled with the results that are possible today,” says Soltz.

Thanks to BlueGene/L, Livermore has become the epicenter of QCD simulations. Soltz, an experimental physicist, is now a part-time theoretical physicist. He and theorists Vranas and Thomas Luu are participating in several collaborations that use BlueGene/L to simulate both the QCD physics that occurred at the time of the very hot big bang and the low-energy QCD particle interactions in the cold universe of today. “BlueGene/L is the most important member of any QCD collaboration,” says Soltz.

A lattice quantum chromodynamics simulation of heated matter being transformed into a quark-gluon plasma.
A lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) simulation shows when matter is heated to about 170 megaelectronvolts, or about 2 trillion degrees, it melts into a quark–gluon plasma. (a) Protons, neutrons, and other nuclear particles exist below the transition temperature. (b) When the transition occurs, (c) a hot plasma emerges full of quarks and gluons. Blue indicates confined quarks, and red indicates deconfined quarks.

A Lattice in Space
Before lattice QCD was developed, QCD calculations depended on perturbative methods, which describe a complicated quantum system in terms of a solvable simple one. A weak disturbance added to the simple system perturbs it. The physical properties of the slightly more complex system can then be determined from equations that describe the behavior of small corrections to the known solutions.

Small perturbations can be calculated in studying a high-energy system, such as the quark–gluon plasma before the big bang. However, challenges arise in a lower-energy system, for example just below the temperature at which quarks coalesced into larger particles. In this latter regime, the perturbations are too far from a known solution to be readily calculated. Lattice QCD, a nonperturbative method, has greatly facilitated the calculations by better simulating both high- and low-energy interactions.

QCD simulations model a box of finite space, defined by the dimensions of the lattice. The quarks live on the lattice points, and interactions occur along the grid lines between the points. When a continuum theory with continuous space–time is represented by a four-dimensional lattice, showing the quarks on the lattice is tricky. The traditional way of dealing with this so-called fermion doubling problem required using a lattice with a large number of lattice points. However, the necessary lattice size increased the amount of computing time beyond anything possible.

Ten years ago, Vranas performed the first numerical simulations that used a new method called domain-wall fermions, which introduced a fifth dimension to the lattice. The residual effects of resolving the doubling problem become smaller as the number of lattice points along the fifth dimension increase. Remarkably, this calculational improvement is achieved with computing cost increasing only linearly as the lattice size increases.

A model of three-dimensional lattice QCD.
In this model, the interconnected geometry of BlueGene/L matches three of the dimensions used in lattice QCD. Lattice QCD also adds a fourth dimension, time, and often a fifth dimension—a calculating procedure. The fifth dimension increases the accuracy of simulation results and eases computing requirements. Researchers do not know whether this dimension corresponds to the physical world.

Graphic showing how an algorithmic operator and its inverter scaled on BlueGene/L.
When Livermore researchers ran lattice QCD on the BlueGene/L system at Livermore, an algorithmic operator (brown) and its inverter (blue) scaled almost perfectly up to a sustained speed of 70.5 trillion floating-point operations per second (teraflops). The lattice was one of the largest ever to be implemented on a computer.

Hot and Cold Calculations
A new collaboration called HotQCD, led by Soltz and Rajan Gupta of Los Alamos National Laboratory, is starting work from what is known about conditions inside the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven. A wealth of data from the RHIC experiments provide compelling evidence of the creation, for a brief moment, of a hot quark–gluon plasma from larger particles such as protons and neutrons. However, no one knows the nature of the transition; how the gold ions were heated; what happened when neutrons and protons broke apart into quarks, gluons, and millions of other particles; or how quarks and gluons moved in the final hot plasma. The theoretical team’s goal is to define the condition of the plasma when the phase transition occurred—that is, the plasma’s temperature, pressure, and energy, or its equation of state. With the information from the RHIC experiments, which blasted larger particles apart into quarks and gluons, the team can “reverse engineer” the conditions of the big bang phase transition, which melted quarks and gluons into larger particles. Only with an accurate equation of state can the full hydrodynamics of the phase transition be modeled.

Simulations to date by the QCD community indicate that the transition occurred when the temperature of the universe dropped below 2 trillion degrees, or 170 million electronvolts (megaelectronvolts). A single electronvolt is a very small measure of energy, equal to 1 volt times the charge of a single electron. “We think we’re accurate to within about 20 megaelectronvolts,” says Soltz. “The HotQCD collaboration is trying to obtain greater accuracy, to within just a few megaelectronvolts.”

Initial QCD equation-of-state calculations began in February 2007 using 10 percent of BlueGene/L. The HotQCD collaboration uses two methods to calculate the equation of state. The methods agree well, and the team’s results show that errors related to a particular method are small. The team is also developing validation techniques for comparing simulations with experimental data from RHIC and from the Large Hadron Collider, the world’s largest particle accelerator scheduled to come on line this year near Geneva, Switzerland.

Luu is applying lattice QCD to better understand the interactions of subatomic particles at low energies and temperatures. He is part of the Nuclear Physics with Lattice QCD collaboration, made up of nuclear physicists from around the world. This collaboration has produced the first predictions of scattering lengths for several combinations of particles, including pion–pion and pion–kaon. Scattering lengths are an indicator of the interactions occurring between the particles. These particles have a very short half-life and are difficult to measure experimentally before they disappear.

The collaboration is now focused on calculating the structure and interactions of the lightest nuclear particles—neutrons and protons, also called nucleons. “A lot of experimental data describe two nucleons,” says Luu, “but no body of data exists for the interaction of three nucleons.” Determining the scattering of these particles is more difficult because the signal-to-noise ratio in low-energy lattice QCD calculations is low. “We need larger calculations to get good data,” says Luu. “BlueGene/L makes it possible.”

Luu and his collaborators recently completed the first fully dynamic lattice QCD determination of the scattering of a nucleon and a hyperon, a more exotic particle. “This area is virgin territory,” says Luu. “It’s a fun wave to be on.”

Photo of Livermore's Pavlos Vranas, Thomas Luu, and Ron Soltz with BlueGene/L supercomputer.
Livermore QCD collaborators (left to right) Pavlos Vranas, Thomas Luu, and Ron Soltz depend on BlueGene/L for their calculations.

Graphic of results of two methods used to calculate the plasma's equation of state through the transition. The HotQCD collaboration used two different methods to calculate the plasma’s equation of state through the transition. Initial results show the two methods agree well.

Bigger Is Better
As the capabilities of particle accelerators increase, scientists can delve deeper into nuclear particles. The smaller the object, the greater the energy needed to probe it. Individual atoms are released when molecules smash together with about 1,000 electronvolts (1 kiloelectronvolt) of energy. With 1,000 times more energy, individual nuclei become apparent. With another 1,000-fold increase of energy, revealing quarks is possible. The RHIC accelerator at Brookhaven can achieve much more, 200 billion electronvolts per nucleon, producing temperatures inside the collision that are hotter than those occurring inside our Sun.

The most powerful accelerator today is the Tevatron at the Department of Energy’s Fermilab in Illinois. The machine is 10 times more energetic than the RHIC accelerator, reaching energies of almost 2 trillion electronvolts, or 2 teraelectronvolts. Fermilab is searching for the Higgs boson, a particle that theory predicts but has proved elusive experimentally. Later this year, the Large Hadron Collider’s 27-kilometer circular accelerator will produce the highest energies yet, in the range of 14 teraelectronvolts. Who knows what strange and wonderful bits of matter this powerful machine will reveal?

Simulation of gold ions colliding inside the PHENIX detector at Brookhaven National Laboratory's Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider. This simulation shows gold ions colliding inside the PHENIX detector at Brookhaven National Laboratory’s Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider in Upton, New York.

Some speculate that the Large Hadron Collider may demonstrate a strongly interacting theory such as QCD but with a different number of colors and flavors and a host of entirely new particles. Because this new theory would be similar to QCD, lattice methods could be used for simulations using larger supercomputers, successors to BlueGene/L.

The need for more computing power is never-ending. Soltz, Vranas, and Luu pounced when a competition call went out from Computing in Science and Engineering last year to describe what could be done with a quadrillion flops, or 1 petaflops, of computing power. The team’s brief essay, “Simulating the Birth of the Universe on a Petaflop,” explained the additional parameters and greater accuracy that more computing power would allow them to include in QCD simulations. Their winning essay appeared in the November–December 2007 issue of the magazine.

“Petaflops machines are not far away,” says Vranas. “With bigger computers, we will be able to model bigger boxes of space with smaller lattice spacing. That means more accuracy. However, we will still be limited in the kinds of questions we can answer. Learning how the universe operates at the quantum level is important, and we will always need larger and more powerful computers for these explanations.”

Katie Walter

Key Words: big bang, BlueGene/L, Gordon Bell Prize, Large Hadron Collider, lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD), quark–gluon plasma, Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC), strong force.

For further information contact Ron Soltz (925) 423-2647 (soltz1@llnl.gov).


S&TR Home | LLNL Home | LLNL Site Map | Top
Site designed and maintained by TID’s Web & Multimedia Group

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the
U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration

Privacy & Legal Notice | UCRL-TR-52000-08-1/2 | January 10, 2008