Stanford-Lab team concludes North Korea's framework compliance can be verified with treaty can be verified
A joint Stanford University-Laboratory team of scientists, nuclear engineers
and arms control experts has concluded in a new study that North Korea’s
compliance with the 1994 Agreed Framework can be verified to a satisfactory
degree of accuracy.
Special effort will be needed, however, from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), as well as support from the United States, the Republic of Korea (ROK), Japan and perhaps other countries. Most importantly, cooperation and openness from the DPRK are essential.
The 1994 Agreed Framework (AF) between the United States and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has become the centerpiece of recent US efforts to reduce the threat of conflict on the Korean peninsula. Under the AF, the United States and its allies (mainly South Korea) will provide the DPRK with two large nuclear-power reactors and other benefits such as annual shipments of fuel oil for the generation of electricity until the nuclear-power reactors being built for that purpose are able to do so.
In exchange the DPRK will declare how much nuclear weapon-usable material it has produced; identify, freeze, and eventually dismantle specified facilities for producing this material; and remain a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and allow the implementation of its safeguards agreement.
The AF is now being carried out according to a complex and currently delayed schedule. Fuel oil shipments have been provided to the DPRK, the site for the two nuclear-power reactors has largely been prepared, and construction has begun on some components. The DPRK, for its part, has declared some nuclear weapon-usable material and has identified and frozen some facilities for producing this material.
As emphasized in President Bush’s statement at the White House on March 7, 2001, verification is an essential part of any agreement with North Korea. How well can it be verified that the DPRK has no access to nuclear weapon-usable material? What is the potential impact of delays, disagreements, and lack of cooperation on verification? The United States and the international community must answer these questions if the nuclear-power reactor project is to proceed as planned.
The report analyzes in detail both the task of safeguarding the nuclear-power reactors to be provided and also that of dealing with known or suspected nuclear-materials production facilities in the DPRK. Scenarios governing both DPRK cooperation and possible non-cooperation, up to and including abrogation of the agreement are considered.
The challenges of verification examined in this report must be met if a necessary minimum of trust is to be established between the parties and the rewards of the agreement are to be realized. The authors believe that the challenges can be met under the conditions outlined in this report, but that special effort on all sides will be needed to meet them.
A copy of the report will soon be available from the Center for Global Security Research Web page at: http://www.llnl.gov/nai/cgsrjd/cgsr.html . A PDF version of the report can currently be downloaded from the CISAC’s Website: http://cisac.stanford.edu/news/pressrelease.html