Lab earns overall grade of outstanding for science, management, operations
For the first time ever, the Laboratory has achieved an overall rating
of "outstanding," as assessed by the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA). The annual assessment, covering the period Oct.
1, 2000, to Sept. 30, 2001, includes appraisals of the Lab’s performance
in three areas — institutional Laboratory management, science and
technology (S&T) and operations and administration (O&A). This
comprehensive evaluation, along with annually negotiated performance standards,
is defined in Appendix F of the UC contract with DOE.
Appendix F covers the annually required assessment of the Lab in these
three areas. Performance expectations are negotiated annually between
NNSA, UC and LLNL. The Lab can score up to 1,000 points under Appendix
F: 100 for Lab management, 500 for S&T, and 400 for O&A. For fiscal
year 2001, LLNL scored 91.1 points or 91.1 percent in Lab management;
469 or 93.8 percent in S&T, and 362 or 90.5 percent in O&A —
for an overall rating of 922 points or 92.2 percent. A score over 90 points
qualifies the Lab for an "outstanding" rating.
The performance-based management (PBM) process covered under Appendix
F was first added to the UC/DOE contract in 1992. The UC labs were the
first within the DOE complex to implement PBM with its focus on self-assessment,
peer review and performance results rather than audit and compliance.
PBM has since been embraced as a DOE-wide policy and is utilized throughout
the contractor community.
The Lab management category is an overarching assessment of the Director’s
Office that covers strategic planning, establishing and communicating
performance expectations, internal and external communications, asset
and infrastructure management, accountability and commitment, and community
relations. The NNSA rating for Lab management increased from a high "excellent"
last year to "outstanding" this year. The NNSA lauded LLNL management
for the significant progress made on the National Ignition Facility, scientific
accomplishments in support of our NNSA missions, effective communications
with NNSA/DOE, enhancements to safeguards and security operations, continued
improvements in Integrated Safety Management, and an effective community
relations programs.
Laboratory S&T received an overall rating of "outstanding,"
an increase from last year’s high "excellent." Each scientific
directorate’s S&T assessment is comprised of a self-assessment,
peer reviews conducted by directorate review committees, an annual assessment
prepared by the UC President’s Council on the National Laboratories,
and validation and rating by DOE/NNSA program managers.
"This year’s scores reflect the critical role the Lab continues
to play in the changing demands of national security," said Jeff
Wadsworth, deputy director for Science & Technology. "We continue
to prove ourselves as a world leader in science and technology, with the
highest standards in operations and management as well. Every single employee
contributed to these outcomes, and we can all be proud of what the Lab
has achieved."
Wadsworth added that recognition for NNSA-related missions was particularly
satisfying, as it was a major focus of Lab goals for the year.
According to John Gilpin, director of Contract Management, the score for
O&A is the highest since the rating system went into effect under
terms of the performance-based UC/DOE contract in 1992.
"This is the first year we’ve gotten ‘outstanding’
ratings on both sides of the house. Our scores were good last year, but
they’re even better now," said Gilpin. "This demonstrates
the professionalism and commitment of all employees and managers to accomplishing
missions and achieving long-term performance improvement."
Gilpin said the scores also reflect an excellent working partnership with
the UC and DOE, helping to identify O&A management priorities and
desired outcomes, and ultimately, enhance performance and operational
effectiveness.
This NNSA "outstanding" performance rating under the annual
Appendix F evaluation follows on the heels of a positive "pass"
rating of the UC labs (Livermore and Los Alamos) in the first one of two
annual reviews under Appendix O of the UC/DOE contract.
Appendix O was added to the contract with the January 2001 modification.
It includes five new program performance initiatives that require UC to
demonstrate improved management oversight of the labs and for the labs
to improve performance in management accountability; safeguards and security
management; facilities safety; critical skills, knowledge and technical
capabilities; and project management and construction project management.
For several initiatives, UC was required by DOE to retain subcontractors
to assist in the work, providing an outside assessment of work at the
labs and identifying opportunities for improvement.
With a two-year timeline for performance improvement, Appendix O has the
highest management attention at NNSA, UC and the labs. The UC labs’
performance success against the Appendix O initiatives is assessed by
NNSA on a "pass/fail" basis for the five initiatives in FY2001
and 2002. The FY2001 rating by NNSA, completed in October 2001, was "pass"
for all five initiatives. Appendix O is proceeding on track for FY2002,
and the next performance review with senior management will be held this
month. UC and the Labs are working with NNSA to bring Appendix O to successful
closure and to streamline the Appendix F process for FY2003.
For the full report with contract, see the Website at
http://www-r.llnl.gov/OCM/FY01_
AppF/OAK _AppF_2001.pdf
.